566 | 0 | 13 |
下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
为探明拔节期和灌浆期旱涝急转对夏玉米光合特性与产量的影响,采用测坑试验,分别在夏玉米拔节期和灌浆期设置旱转轻涝(LF)和旱转重涝(SF)2个旱涝急转处理,以适宜水分处理(CK)为对照,测定叶片叶绿素相对含量(SPAD)、净光合速率(Pn)、蒸腾速率(Tr)、气孔导度(Gs)、胞间CO2浓度(Ci)以及最终产量。结果表明:旱胁迫处理期间,各处理叶片的SPAD、Pn、Tr和Gs随胁迫时间的延长逐渐降低;旱涝急转处理过程中,Pn、Tr和Gs随着涝胁迫持续时间的延长呈先上升后下降的趋势;旱涝急转结束时,Pn、Tr和Gs均小于CK;旱涝急转结束后,Pn、Tr和Gs呈现逐渐恢复的过程,LF的恢复速度快于SF,Ci与Pn、Tr和Gs呈相反的变化趋势。拔节期旱涝急转LF和SF产量与CK相比显著降低13.60%和18.88%,灌浆期降低5.24%和10.86%;SF处理对减产的影响更显著。夏玉米在拔节期发生旱涝急转对光合特性以及产量的影响较大,生产上尽量避免该阶段发生旱涝急转。
Abstract:To investigate the impacts of drought-waterlogging abrupt alternation(DWAA) during the jointing and filling stages on photosynthetic characteristics and yield of summer maize, a pit experiment was conducted. Two DWAA treatments—drought followed by light waterlogging(LF) and drought followed by severe waterlogging(SF)—were applied during these critical stages, with a well-watered treatment(CK) as the control. Key parameters including leaf chlorophyll relative content(SPAD), net photosynthetic rate(Pn), transpiration rate(Tr), stomatal conductance(Gs), intercellular CO2 concentration(Ci), and final yield were measured. Results showed that during drought stress, SPAD, Pn, Tr, and Gs gradually decreased across all treatments as stress duration increased. In the DWAA process, Pn, Tr, and Gs initially increased and then decreased with prolonged waterlogging stress. At the end of DWAA, these parameters were consistently lower than those of CK. Post-DWAA, Pn, Tr, and Gs exhibited gradual recovery, with LF demonstrating faster recovery than SF. Ci displayed an inverse trend compared to Pn, Tr, and Gs. Compared to CK, yields under LF and SF treatments during the jointing stage significantly decreased by 13.60% and 18.88%, respectively, while reductions during the filling stage were 5.24% and 10.86%. SF exerted a more pronounced impact on yield loss. The study indicates that DWAA during the jointing stage critically impairs photosynthetic performance and yield formation in summer maize, suggesting the necessity to avoid such stress events during this phase in agricultural practice.
[1] 中华人民共和国国家统计局.中国统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2021.
[2] WATANABE T,CULLMANN J,PATHAK S C,et al.Management of climatic extremes with focus on floods and droughts in agriculture[J].Irrigation and Drainage,2018,67(1):29-42.
[3] 毕吴瑕,翁白莎,王旭,等.基于知识图谱的旱涝急转研究进展[J].水资源保护,2021,37(6):40-48,120.
[4] 黄星怡,张佳乐,杨肖丽,等.黄河流域水文干旱时空特征研究[J].华北水利水电大学学报(自然科学版),2023,44(3):25-34.
[5] 曹永强,宁月,李玲慧,等.基于SPEI指数的河北省多尺度旱涝特征分析[J].华北水利水电大学学报(自然科学版),2021,42(3):76-85.
[6] 董宛麟,程路,孙志刚,等.夏玉米产量时空变化及气候年型分析[J].玉米科学,2020,28(5):110-118.
[7] 李彦彬,卢争光,李道西,等.连旱对夏玉米叶绿素荧光特性、产量和水分利用效率的影响[J].灌溉排水学报,2023,42(3):26-31,39.
[8] 孔建禄,曾湧,李世成,等.干旱胁迫对玉米生长、生理指标及品质的影响[J].玉米科学,2023,31(4):91-98.
[9] 路振广,邱新强,张明智,等.干旱胁迫对夏玉米叶片光合特性及产量的影响[J].节水灌溉,2019(2):34-42.
[10] 王群,赵向阳,刘东尧,等.淹水弱光复合胁迫对夏玉米根形态结构、生理特性和产量的影响[J].中国农业科学,2020,53(17):3479-3495.
[11] SZELES V A,MEGYES A,NAGY J.Irrigation and nitrogen effects on the leaf chlorophyll content and grain yield of maize in different crop years[J].Agricultural Water Management,2012,107:133-144.
[12] 周新国,韩会玲,李彩霞,等.拔节期淹水玉米的生理性状和产量形成[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(9):119-125.
[13] 余卫东,冯利平,胡程达.涝渍胁迫下玉米苗期不同叶龄叶片光合特性[J].玉米科学,2019,27(5):73-80,86.
[14] 冯跃华,姜云鹭,肖俊夫.豫东平原夏玉米耐淹试验研究[J].灌溉排水学报,2011,30(6):120-122.
[15] 李从锋,贾春兰,陶志强,等.拔节期淹水对不同株高夏玉米产量、形态特征及物质生产的影响[J].玉米科学,2019,27(6):62-67.
[16] ZAIDI P,SELVAN M P,SULTANA R,et al.Association between line per se and hybrid performance under excessive soil moisture stress in tropical maize (Zea mays L.)[J].Field Crops Research,2006,101(1):117-126.
[17] 王梦珂,毕吴瑕,翁白莎,等.旱涝急转对作物生长发育及产量的影响研究综述[J].水利水电技术,2019,50(11):189-196.
[18] 房稳静,武建华,陈松,等.不同生育期积水对夏玉米生长和产量的影响试验[J].中国农业气象,2009,30(4):616-618.
[19] 高芸,吕海英,齐学斌,等.夏玉米产量及根系生长对旱涝急转的响应特征[J].人民黄河,2022,44(8):145-150.
[20] TIAN L X,BI W S,REN X S,et al.Flooding has more adverse effects on the stem structure and yield of spring maize (Zea mays L.) than waterlogging in Northeast China[J].European Journal of Agronomy,2020,117:126054.
[21] 刘承,李佐同,杨克军,等.水分胁迫及复水对不同耐旱性玉米生理特性的影响[J].植物生理学报,2015,51(5):702-708.
[22] 张俊杰,陈金平,汤钰镂,等.花期前后干旱胁迫对复水后夏玉米光合特性与产量的影响[J].作物学报,2023,49(5):1397-1409.
[23] 任佰朝,朱玉玲,李霞,等.大田淹水对夏玉米光合特性的影响[J].作物学报,2015,41(2):329-338.
[24] 刘祖贵,刘站东,肖俊夫,等.淹涝胁迫对夏玉米光合参数及产量的影响[J].灌溉排水学报,2014,33(6):41-46.
[25] 俞双恩,刘子鑫,高世凯,等.旱涝交替胁迫对水稻荧光参数与光合特性的影响[J].农业机械学报,2019,50(12):304-312.
[26] REN B Z,ZHANG J W,LI X,et al.Effects of waterlogging on the yield and growth of summer maize under field conditions[J].Canadian Journal of Plant Science,2014,94(1):23-31.
[27] 任佰朝,张吉旺,李霞,等.淹水胁迫对夏玉米籽粒灌浆特性和品质的影响[J].中国农业科学,2013,46:4435-4445.
[28] 周新国,韩会玲,李彩霞,等.玉米灌浆期渍水对产量及氮磷淋失量的影响[J].农业工程学报,2012,28(14):99-103.
[29] 王成雨,慕丽,李森郁,等.拔节期水分冗余胁迫对淮北平原夏玉米产量形成机制的影响[J].农业工程学报,2022,38(2):87-94.
[30] 刘祖贵,刘战东,肖俊夫,等.苗期与拔节期淹涝抑制夏玉米生长发育、降低产量[J].农业工程学报,2013,29(5):44-52.
[31] 余卫东,冯利平,胡程达,等.苗期涝渍对黄淮地区夏玉米生长和产量的影响[J].生态学杂志,2015,34(8):2161-2166.
[32] 余卫东,冯利平,盛绍学,等.黄淮地区涝渍胁迫影响夏玉米生长及产量[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(13):127-136.
基本信息:
DOI:10.19760/j.ncwu.zk.2025032
中图分类号:S513
引用信息:
[1]李彦彬,程智超,高世凯等.旱涝急转对夏玉米光合特性与产量的影响[J].华北水利水电大学学报(自然科学版),2025,46(02):137-144.DOI:10.19760/j.ncwu.zk.2025032.
基金信息:
国家自然科学基金项目(52179015); 河南省重大科技专项(201300311400)